Legal Innovation is a key opportunity for new legal thinkers in the 21st Century. The practice of law isn't hugely different than what it was inthe 1990s, 1950s or 1900s. No other profession has been static... and the stresses on the profession and the clash with the demands of the contemporary world are starting to show.
If you take a doctor out of the 1800s and ask them to practice now, they wouldn't know where to begin.
If you take a barrister out of the 1800s and ask them to practice now, they'd at least find the forms and theatre of the law similar. They'd know to read the statutes, and to research case law. They'd at least be able to muddle through.
It shouldn't be that way. We can do better. Lawyers can and should be innovators, tossing out the lethargic structures and finding better ways.
Cameron Edward Matthee-Johnson
BA (Hons) - Sociology/Criminology (2013)
JD (2019)
Cameron is a law student, legal techologist, criminologist, and rabble-rouser who thinks that the legal profession can be more efficient, more accessible, and more responsive to the realities we encounter in the 21st Cenury.
Cameron has designed applications to provide legal information regarding divorce eligibility, and an intake triage application for use by the Elizabeth Fry Society. The potential for future legal automation to drive accessibility and efficiency in law is limitless.